DIAGNOSTIC SENSITIVITY OF CORONARY CTA VERSUS CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Chyia Surchew Shareef, Aska Farooq Jamal

Abstract


Background: The coronary artery diseases are public health problem responsible for millions of deaths yearly all over the world. Earlier detection of these diseases is essential in treatment and prevention of high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to find out the accuracy of detecting significant coronary stenosis by computerized tomography angiography versus conventional coronary angiography.

Materials & methods: Present study was retrospective cross-sectional study implemented in Cardiac center at Erbil city, Kurdistan region-Iraq in duration of six months from 1st of April to 31st of September, 2023 on sample of 100 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Saved records of patients who were admitted in cardiac center hospital were reviewed regarding conventional angiogram with computerized tomography angiography in radiology department of this hospital.

Results: There were no significant differences between CTA findings and conventional angiography findings regarding coronary stenosis detection, severity of stenosis, LAD stenosis, CX stenosis, RCA stenosis, LM stenosis, diameter of stenosis and area of stenosis (p>0.05). There was a highly significant relationship between CTA stenosis detection and conventional angiography stenosis detection (p<0.001) with validity findings of CTA in diagnosis of stenosis were (75.9% sensitivity, 80.4% specificity and 78% accuracy).

Conclusions: The computed tomography angiography has an acceptable accuracy in diagnosis of coronary artery diseases as compared to conventional invasive angiography.


Keywords


Angiography, Coronary artery disease, Coronary Stenosis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Huang R, Luo G, Liu MN, Chen WL, Luo Q, Ma WZ, et al. Kaixuan Qibi granules attenuate myocardial fibrosis through BRD4 blockade regulated by the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway. J Tradit Complement Med. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2025.03.001

Khan MA, Hashim MJ, Mustafa H, Baniyas MY, Al Suwaidi S, AlKatheeri R, et al. Global epidemiology of ischemic heart disease: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9349. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9349

World Health Organization. Relation of cardiovascular risk factors with coronary angiographic findings in Iraqi patients with ischemic heart disease. 2018 [cited 2025 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261358464

Oikonomou E, Theofilis P, Lampsas S, Katsarou O, Kalogeras K, Marinos G, et al. Current concepts and future applications of non-invasive functional and anatomical evaluation of coronary artery disease. Life (Basel). 2022;12(11):1803. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111803

Ramjattan NA, Lala V, Kousa O, Shams P, Makaryus AN. Coronary CT angiography. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [updated 2024 Jan 19]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470279/

Rudziński PN, Kruk M, Demkow M, Oleksiak A, Schoepf JU, Mach M, et al. Efficacy and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with a high clinical likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease. Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(1):56-63. https://doi.org/10.33963/kp.a2021.0185

Maurovich-Horvat P, Bosserdt M, Kofoed KF, Rieckmann N, Benedek T, Donnelly P, et al. CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(17):1591-602. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2200963

Kheiri B, Simpson TF, Osman M, German DM, Fuss CS, Ferencik M. Computed tomography vs invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(12):2147-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.003

Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, Goodacre S, Oatey K, O'Brien R, et al. Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;374:n2106. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2106

Serruys PW, Hara H, Garg S, Kawashima H, Nørgaard BL, Dweck MR, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for complete assessment of coronary artery disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(7):713-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019

Haase R, Schlattmann P, Gueret P, Andreini D, Pontone G, Alkadhi H, et al. Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMJ. 2019;365:l1945. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1945

Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C, Boon NA, Dweck MR, Flather M, et al. Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(10):924-33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1805971

Kis M, Yurdam FS. The relationship between degree of coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography and ACEF risk score in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Ann Saudi Med. 2023;43(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.35

Ru L, Lan P, Xu C, Lu L, Chen T. The value of coronary CTA in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(5):5287-93.

Gambre AS, Liew C, Hettiarachchi G, Lee SSG, MacDonald M, Kam CJW, et al. Accuracy and clinical outcomes of coronary CT angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a single-centre study in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2018;59(8):413-8. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2018096

Hoe J. What do we currently know and not know about coronary CT angiography? Cardiovasc Imaging Asia. 2020;4(3):61-6. https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2020.00059

Youash F, Kamal M. Diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease by computed tomography angiography as compared to conventional invasive angiography. Kirkuk J Med Sci. 2023;11(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.32894/kjms.2023.139128.1057

Mancini GBJ, Leipsic J, Budoff MJ, Hague CJ, Min JK, Stevens SR, et al. CT angiography followed by invasive angiography in patients with moderate or severe ischemia—insights from the ISCHEMIA trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(7):1384-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.11.012

Rzaij IA, Rashash DS, Mahmood NT. Risk factors of cardiovascular disease in Iraq from 2000 to 2023: a systematic review. Int J Health Syst Med Sci. 2023;2(12):179-94.

Ghafil NY, Dananah FM, Hassan ES, Alkaabi YSA. Comorbidities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comprehensive study. J Med Life. 2023;16(7):1013-6. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0057




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46903/gjms/23.2.1819

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025. Chyia Surchew Shareef, Aska Farooq Jamal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Gomal Medical College, Daraban Road, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan

ISSN: 1819-7973, e-ISSN: 1997-2067

Website: https://www.gmcdikhan.edu.pk

Phone: +92-966-747373

Scimago Journal & Country Rank