Fauzia Anbreen, Samina Qadir, Iram Batool, Rubina Babar


Background: Hysterectomy is the major procedure performed abdominally/vaginally. Uterovaginal (UV) prolapse
is preventable but still common indication for Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH). The aim of this study was to compare
different aspects of abdominal and vaginal approach to hysterectomy and to find out frequency of prolapse.
Material & Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted at the department of obstetrics and gynaecology
at DHQ Teaching Hospital, D.I.Khan. The study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2014. Sampling
technique was purposive sampling. Sample size was 123. Information regarding socio-demographic characteristics
was noted. Indication for surgery, type of hysterectomy and post-operative morbidity and mortality were our
research variables. In patients with UV prolapse information about place of delivery and person who conducted
delivery was also recorded. Data collecting tools were charts/ register. Data was analyzed by using percentage
and frequency using SPSS.
Results: Within study period total gynecological admissions were 1693. 185 (11%) were major surgeries. 123
(66%) were hysterectomies. Average age was 50 years in VH and 52.5 years in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
(TAH). The mean parity was 9 in VH and 4 in TAH, 48 (92%) Patients of VH were illiterate. While in TAH 30 (42.2%)
patients were illiterate.. Among indications prolapse was responsible for 44% of total hysterectomies and it was
only indication for VH. Complication rate of VH was 5.8% and TAH was 5.6%.
Conclusion: Most common indication was UV prolapse and most frequent procedure was abdominal hysterectomy.
UV prolapse is associated with large family size and home deliveries. Post-operative complications rate
difference was in significant in the two procedures.


Hysterectomy; Prolapsed uterus; Fibroid

Full Text:



Bashir R, Parveen Z, Sultan R, Khan B. A two years audit of complications of hysterectomy at Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad. J Ayub MedColl 2005; 17: 47-9.

Pandey D, Sehgal K, Saxena A, Hebbar S, Nambiar J and Bhat GR. An audit of indications, complications and justifications of Hysterectomies at a Teaching Hospital in India. Int J sRep Med 2014, ID 279273, 6 pages.http://dx.doi. org/10.1155/2014./279273.

Tabassum R, Fariha S, Sabbar S, Hasnain F, Hanif F, Hanif R. Morbidity and post-operative recovery of hysterectomy cases. J Surg Pak 2010; 15: 73-7.

McPherson K, Metcalfe MA, Herbert A, Maresh M, Casbard A, Hargreaves J, et al. Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 111: 688-94.

Brown AD, Magistretti Al, Ferris I, Steward DE. Hospital Report 2001: Preliminary studies volume 2. Exploring women’s health. 2001.

J.M.Wu, M.E. Wechter, E.J. Geller, T.V. Nguyen and A.G. Visco, Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1091-5.

Desai S, T Sinha T, Mahal A. Prevalence of hysterectomy among rural and urban women with and without health insurance in Gujarat, India. Reprod Health Matters 2011; 19: 42-51.

A Singh, AK Arora. Why hystrectomy rate are lower in India? Ind J Community Med 2008; 33: 196-7.

Parveen S, Naheed F, Batool A, Gynecological hysterectomies; an audit in tertiary care hospital. Professional Med J 2014; 21: 432-5.

N Lee, R dicker, G Rubin and H Ory. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnosis for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 283-7.

Chohan A. Fundamentals of Gynaecology,1st ed.Lahore: MA Rpublisher 2015; p:107-19.

Fayyaz S, Majid SS. Audit of gynecological hysterectomies. J Postgrad Med Inst 2001; 15: 208-12.

Ojiyi E, Dike E, Anolue F, Nzewuihe A and Ejiken C. Uterovaginal prolapse at a Hospital in South- East Nigeria. Orient Jom 2013; 25: 107-12.

Amin A, Ali A, Amin Z and Sani FN. Justification for hystrectomies and frequency of histo-pathological lesions of hystrectomy at a teaching hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2013; 29: 170.

Kulkarni MM, Rogers RG. Vaginal Hysterectomy for benign disease without prolapse. ClinobstetGynecol 2010; 53: 5-16.

Onowhakpor EA, Omo-Aghoja LO, Akani CI, Feyi-WabosoP. Prevalence and determinants of utevovaginal prolapse in Southern Nigeria. Niger Med J 2009; 50: 29-32.

Shaikh, Ahmed T, Fatima M, Zehra M. Hysterectomies; An audit at a tertiary care hospital. Professional Med J 2011; 18: 46-50.

TC, OKEKE et al. An audit of uterovginal prolapse in Enugu, South East Nigeria. Am J Clin Med Res 2013; 1: 23-5.

Chen B, Ren DP, Li JX, Li CD. Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective non-randomized trial. Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30: 875-9.

Balogun Or. Genital prolapse in Ilorin. A seven year review. Niger J Med 1997; 6: 77-82.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

© 2011 Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences