DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF PLEURAL BIOPSY USING ABRAMS NEEDLE

Nausheen Saifullah, Saifullah Baig, Niaz Hussain Soomro, Nadeem Rizvi, Aneeqa Ahsan Zafar

Abstract


Background: To determine the diagnostic yield of closed percutaneous pleural biopsy using Abrams needle and obtaining specific diagnosis in cases of exudative pleural effusion.
Material & Methods: This observational study was undertaken during March 2015 to September 2015 in the
Department of Thoracic Medicine Jinnah Post Graduate Medical Center Karachi. All patients with pleural effusion who were admitted and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study .Percutaneous pleural biopsy using Abrams needle was performed in all patients, the samples were sent for histopathology. The data was entered in a pre-designed performa.
Results: A total of 60 patients participated in the study. The male to female ratio was 1.6:1. Average age of patients was 42.8 years. Data revealed that yield of pleural biopsy using Abrams needle was 70%. Specific diagnosis through Abram’s biopsy have shown 21 (35%) cases of tuberculosis, 16 (26.7%) cases of adenocarcinoma, 4 (6.7%) cases of chronic non specific inflammation, one (1.7%) case of lymphoma and 18 (30%) cases could not be reached for any diagnosis.
Conclusion: Due to availability of newer techniques and image guided biopsies, closed needle biopsy procedures are becoming less common in developed countries. However, in a set up like Pakistan, due to the higher cost and lack of availability of newer techniques, closed biopsy procedures remain the standard of management for the diagnosis of pleural effusions.

Keywords


Abrams biopsy; Pleural effusion; Pleural biopsy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Diaz-Guzman E, Dweik RA. Diagnosis and management of pleural effusions: a practical approach. Compr Ther 2007; 33: 237-46.

Marel M, Zrustova M, Stasny B, Light RW. The incidence of pleural effusion in a well-defined region.Epidemiologic study in central Bohemia. Chest 1993;104: 1486–9.

San Jose ME, Alvarez D, Valdes L. Utility of tumor markers in the diagnosis of neoplastic effusion. Clin Chim Acta 1997; 265: 193-207.

Koegelenberg CFN, Bolliger CT, Theron J. Direct comparison of the diagnostic yield of ultrasound-assisted Abrams and Tru-Cut needle biopsies for pleural tuberculosis. Thorax 2010; 65:857-62.

Valdes L, Alvarez D. The Etiology of Pleural Effusion in an area with high incidence of tuberculosis. Chest: 1996; 23:158-62.

Khurram M, Jaffery AH, Khar HB. Evaluation of lymphocytic exudative pleural effusion with pleural biopsy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2002; 12:74-7.

Blanc FX, Atassi K. Diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy in pleural disease. Chest 2002; 121:1677-83.

Ernst A, Hersh CP, Herth F. A novel instrument for the evaluation of the pleural space. Chest 2002; 122:1530-4.

S.Nusair R, Breuer G, Amir, Berkman N. Closed pleural needle biopsy: predicting diagnostic yield by examining pleural fluid parameters. Respir Med 2002; 18: 890-94.

Ogirala RG, Agarwal V, Visioli LD. Comparision of the Raja and the Abrams pleural biopsy needles in patients with pleural effusion. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147:1291–94.

Magsi JA, Khan SU, Awan SR. Pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphocytic exudative pleural effusion. Ann King Edward Med Coll 2005; 11:572-4.

Mehrdad S, Mirmohamad M. Approach to undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion: the diagnostic yield of blind pleural biopsy. Caspian J Intern Med 2013;4:642-47.

Mare M, Stastny B, Melinova L, Svandova E, Light RW. Diagnosis of pleural effusion: Experience with clinical studies, 1986 to 1990.Chest 1995; 107: 1598-1603.

Fenton KN, Richardson JD. Diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions. Am J Surg 1995; 170: 69-74.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Nausheen Saifullah, Saifullah Baig, Niaz Hussain Soomro, Nadeem Rizvi, Aneeqa Ahsan Zafar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.