COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STUDY DESIGNS IN HEALTH RESEARCH

Iftikhar Ahmad, Muhammad Marwat, Habibullah Khan

Abstract


Background: A research design is a framework or guiding plan to approach the research subject, data collection, data analysis and study the research problem. Choosing an appropriate study design is a crucial step ahead of researcher. Every Research study design has inherent strengths & weaknesses. It is the situation & the objectives that determine the suitability of a Research study design for a study and not the absolute superiority of one above the other. This study was conducted with the objective to review the strengths, and limitations of research designs and methods of different study designs.
Discussion: Strict adherence to research design can provide high-class evidence for rational clinical decision-making.3
Conclusion: Different research designs have their own inherent strengths & weaknesses. Before employing a study, careful thought must be given to an understanding of the scientific principles & the appropriateness of the proposed study design, operational feasibility, information to be obtained, expected duration of the study and expenses. One of the most important steps before beginning research is deciding on your research design.

Keywords


Epidemiologic research design; Research design; Comparative study; Observational study; Study characteristics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Yang W, Zilov A, Soewondo P, Bech OM, Sekkal

F, Home PD. Observational studies: going beyond

the boundaries of randomized controlled trials.

Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010; 88 Suppl, 1:S3-S9.

K Park. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social

Medicine. 8th ed. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot;

p.606-21.

Greene T. Randomized and observational studies

in nephrology: how strong is the evidence? Am J

Kidney Dis 2009; 53:377-88.

Yang LJ, Chang KW, Chung KC. Methodologically

rigorous clinical research. Plast Reconstr

Surg 2012; 129:979e-988e.

Peipert JF, Gifford DS, Boardman LA. Research

design and methods of quantitative synthesis of

medical evidence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:473-

Noordzij M, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Jager KJ.

Study designs in clinical research. Nephron Clin

Pract 2009; 113:218-21.

Aoun SM, Kristjanson LJ. Challenging the framework

for evidence in palliative care research.

Palliat Med 2005; 19:461-5.

Hadley G, Derry S, Moore RA, Wee B. Can observational

studies provide a realistic alternative to

randomized controlled trials in palliative care? J

Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2009; 23:106-13.

Jager KJ, Stel VS, Wanner C, Zoccali C, Dekker

FW. The valuable contribution of observational

studies to nephrology. Kidney Int 2007; 72:671-5.

Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Observational

studies versus randomized controlled trials:

avenues to causal inference in nephrology. Adv

Chronic Kidney Dis 2012; 19:11-8.

Callas PW. Searching the biomedical literature:

research study designs and critical appraisal. Clin

Lab Sci 2008; 21:42-8.

Hartrick CT. Quality assessment in clinical trials:

considerations for outcomes research in interventional

pain medicine. Pain Pract 2008; 8:433-8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Iftikhar Ahmad, Muhammad Marwat, Habibullah Khan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.